Skip to content

Conversation

@geeksilva97
Copy link
Contributor

@geeksilva97 geeksilva97 commented Jan 29, 2026

Fixes #61565

Add location to the test placeholder

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/test_runner

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test_runner Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem. labels Jan 29, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.75%. Comparing base (24b1650) to head (1e6e3dd).
⚠️ Report is 109 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #61573      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.52%   89.75%   +1.23%     
==========================================
  Files         704      673      -31     
  Lines      208863   203843    -5020     
  Branches    40335    39179    -1156     
==========================================
- Hits       184905   182969    -1936     
+ Misses      15928    13196    -2732     
+ Partials     8030     7678     -352     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/internal/test_runner/runner.js 93.14% <100.00%> (+0.19%) ⬆️

... and 143 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@geeksilva97 geeksilva97 requested a review from MoLow January 29, 2026 13:07
const { spawnSync } = require('node:child_process');
const fixtures = require('../common/fixtures');

const testFile = fixtures.path('test-runner', 'syntax-error-test.mjs');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As the original issue states "test:enqueue event has no file field", should we cover it with a test?

@geeksilva97 geeksilva97 force-pushed the fix-test-runner-enqueue branch from 22983f0 to 1e6e3dd Compare January 30, 2026 03:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test_runner Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

For test file with syntax error, no "file" field for test:enqueue event with isolation: "none"

5 participants